The peer review process is a cornerstone of scientific publishing, ensuring the integrity, quality, and relevance of research articles. By providing objective, constructive feedback, reviewers play a vital role in upholding the journal’s standards and contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge. At Environment & Science, we value the expertise and dedication of our reviewers and aim to make the review process efficient and transparent.
Review Materials and Submission
Reviewers who accept the invitation to review a manuscript will receive the original manuscript in PDF format and a review form in Word format via email. The review form includes clear instructions and guidelines to assist reviewers in preparing a detailed and constructive report. This ensures a consistent and high-quality evaluation process.
Review Timeline
Upon accepting the invitation, reviewers are requested to submit their completed review reports within 14 days. If additional time is needed, reviewers should promptly contact the editorial office to request an extension.
Review Criteria
Reviewers are encouraged to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
- Originality: Does the manuscript present novel findings or insights?
- Scientific Rigor: Are the methods and analysis robust and appropriate?
- Clarity: Is the manuscript well-structured, with clear arguments and conclusions?
- Relevance: Does the study align with the journal’s scope and contribute to the field?
- References: Are the citations relevant, accurate, and up-to-date?
- Constructive feedback should highlight both strengths and areas for improvement, offering actionable suggestions to enhance the manuscript.
Ethical Considerations
Reviewers must adhere to strict confidentiality standards. Manuscripts should not be shared or discussed outside the review process. Additionally, reviewers should disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise their impartiality. If a conflict arises, reviewers are encouraged to decline the invitation to review.
Additional Guidelines
- Anonymity: The journal employs a single-blind review process, meaning the reviewer’s identity is concealed from the authors.
- Plagiarism Concerns: If reviewers suspect plagiarism or unethical practices, they should report these concerns to the editorial office.
- Decision Recommendations: Reviewers are asked to provide a clear recommendation regarding the manuscript, such as acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection.
Reviewer Recognition
Environment & Science appreciates the time and effort contributed by reviewers. To acknowledge their work, the journal may offer recognition through certificates, annual acknowledgments in the journal, or inclusion in reviewer credit platforms like Publons or ORCID.
For any queries or support during the review process, please contact the editorial office at office@environmentandscience.com. Your expertise is invaluable in maintaining the journal’s commitment to publishing high-quality research.